Beyond Apartheid: The case for a one-state solution
A one-state solution remains the most logical route to end the conflict and build a just future for Palestinians and Israelis, argues Ghada Karmi.
The two-state solution is often predicated on the 1967 borders, which would leave 78 per cent of the land in the hands of Israelis, and just 22 per cent for Palestinians.
A one-state solution remains the most logical route to end the conflict and build a just future for Palestinians and Israelis, argues Ghada Karmi.
Among the most serious of the many destructive effects of the ongoing war on Palestine is that it may set back the search for a solution to the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict for years to come.
Despite five Arab-Israeli wars, a plethora of UN resolutions and numerous international peace proposals since 1967, nothing has succeeded in producing a solution acceptable to all sides.
Author's summary: A one-state solution is the most logical route to end the conflict.
More News
- "Absolutely appalled": Young Republicans face fallout after racist messages leak
- Brendan Gallagher: No-one is immune to this awful disease
- Nathi Mthethwa: Some questions - OPINION | Politicsweb
- Celebrating MVRHS Graduates: Caleb Nicholson - The Martha's Vineyard Times
- Vallas: How to improve Chicago’s billion-dollar transit crisis
- Deen’s Daily: Erik Johnson Suited for Broadcast Work; Goalie Injuries; NYR Record
- Stripe’s Bridge applies for national trust charter
- 2025 Atlanta Braves Player Review: Charlie Morton
- Did Katy Perry just confirm her romance with Justin Trudeau?
- Cheryl Hines Suddenly Has a Lot to Say About RFK Jr. and MAGA - Washingtonian